Slop*Detector

Verdict for github.com


SUSPICIOUSLY VIBEY — slop score 73/100

The evidence here is a bit messier than the usual vibe-coded landing page, because this is a GitHub README for an established project, but the slop score still lands at 73 for a reason. The README's own documentation stacks em dashes and FAQ-style one-liners ("How does it work? How to contribute? How many users are possible?") in a run that reads more like generated filler than a maintainer answering real questions, and the prose leans hard on expanded forms over contractions, 149 to 34, which is the kind of ratio you see when a model drafts the text rather than a person typing it out. The Terms of Service and Privacy Policy both carry the same tells, em dashes included, which suggests those legal pages went out without a human editing pass. None of this proves the underlying software is AI slop since it's a widely used self-hosting tool, but the written surface, from the GitHub Pages docs to the policy pages, shows enough generated-text fingerprints that I'd flag the project's documentation and legal boilerplate as unreviewed rather than hand-written. Confidence on the writing-layer verdict is solid; confidence on the codebase itself being vibe-coded is low, since that's outside what this evidence actually covers.”}}

Findings